Bookmark This WebsiteReturn To Home PageContact Us

Any Ashcroft public injured by LAC HE non compliant ops: the following will be held to account

Public safety issues:  enough 'ducking and diving'  from the UK CAA
UK CAA 'endangerment laws only invoked after deaths & injuries' WS to Shoreham Coroner here

'Here at the Civil Aviation Authority we have a framework of values and behaviours that guide the way we work. These aren’t empty words, they underpin everything that we do"

Kate Staples learn from someone smarter than you [AEThe world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil but because of the people who dont do anything about it

UK Civil Aviation Authority described as "A big hydrogen balloon waiting to burst"

 The UK Civil Aviation Authority continue to mislead Her Majesty's Courts re:

Non-compliant LAC high energy aircraft taking-off [and] landing towards 15,000 members of our Community, exercising their lawful rights to use our boundary road each year.

2006: CAA regulatory review of GA: "for securing the safety of air navigation and the safety of aircraft and of persons and property carried therein, [and] for preventing aircraft endangering other persons and property". The UK Rules of the Air Regulations are enabled under the ANO"

Steve Jary" The CAA are no longer confident that they can do their job – keeping the public safe
but they can’t speak out: about 30 have left with confidentiality agreements in their exit packages.” 


The CAA continues to mislead HM Courts: no mechanism in place to protect our public

How bad does it have to get, before the Court's take over to protect the general public?

A Court will expect high standards of integrity from CAA's Tony Rapson / Kate Staples

UK CAA: the statutory corporation that regulates & oversees all aspects of civil aviation

Seventeen months before the Shoreham Airshow an ex-CAA expert states [2014]

Quote: "The CAA is unlikely to invoke Articles 137 and 138 [Endangering] unless someone has been seriously injured or killed by the reckless or negligent actions of a pilot" Unquote

Was the author of this controversial statement out of touch with the Directorate of Airspace Policy?


05 Nov 2017: "The org itself operates in an unregulated bubble, ignoring the ethos it serves up to the aviation industry. It is widely recognised around 6+ yrs ago the senior management team were brought into an already very effective, professional organisation and have steadily dismantled it, while squeezing it in all areas so as to justify their own highly inflated salaries and bonuses.

Long term emps especially management are motivated by protecting their pensions rather than delivering business value.
HR has a systematic pattern of covering up poor performance issues rather than investigating and addressing them for fear of the risk of casting the CAA in a poor light.
Eg a manager allowed to create a role for and hire their mistress - clear gross misconduct in any other public sector organisation.
HR mismanagement of sexual harassment by a senior - again should be treated as misconduct but the injured Party blamed.
Corporate customers duped with false information.
These are some of the cover ups I'm personally aware of so if a rock or two were turned the level of corruption would likely make the BBC look positively saintly.

Advice to Management: Perhaps as the Americans say - "try your own dog food" rather than just selling it - i.e. Regulation.
When something goes wrong, no need for a witch hunt, just acknowledge, investigate thoroughly, put things right where possible, and develop a culture of positive behaviour rather than encouraging 'creeps' by reinforcing their inappropriate behaviour by making it acceptable"


Image result for uk civil aviation authority

Is the UK CAA deliberately crossing a red line regarding public risk? We'll ask a Court






CAA staff are transient - policies remain.15,000 road users have a message for Tony Rapson


Prospect calls for CAA to be broken up
Prospect has called for the UK’s aviation regulator to be split up, in a letter to transport secretary Patrick McLoughlin, amid concerns that safety is no longer its paramount concern





[2] From a CAA employee (26 Sep 2016) How bad does it have to get ?

"A badly executed attempt at a cultural change has left a toxic atmosphere and constant uneasy feeling. There is no trust in leadership / senior management"
Advice to Management: "There needs to be a fundamental leadership change. The current leadership are beyond the point of no return. The new leadership needs to start afresh.. Disown everything that went before"






CAA's Chris Finnigan [self proclaimed Motorcycle & Microlight hooligan] states on 1:57pm 17 Oct 2012 ... "In private flying the law does not impose any specified safety factor.." 

Mr Finnigan, please explain this microlight philosophy  to the relatives of the deceased on our eastern boundary road due to a LAC 'high energy' aircraft overrunning our 500m grass runway, using unfactorised take-off performance data [ah you're retired. Don't worry we'll explain this deficiency to a Court in your absence. D-EARY has 5 times the inertia of any aircraft that you've ever experienced]

Compare Finnigan's comments above with an expert experienced in high energy aircraft ops
Geoff Connolly [BAAC expert]
 ... email 05/29/14 at 9:33 AM
"Steve, the ‘reasonable steps’ referred to in the ANO, and the effects of sub para (a) below, make it very difficult to ignore the performance information in the Flight Manual.


Commander to be satisfied that flight can be safely completed
87 The commander of a flying machine must, before take-off, take all reasonable steps so as to be satisfied that it is capable of safely taking off, reaching and maintaining a safe height and making a safe landing at the place of intended destination having regard to:
(a) the performance of the flying machine in the conditions to be expected on the intended flight

So LBA rules, and you have to go with performance as in the flight manual, but the pilot must, in my opinion, have regard to the factors in 
SSL 07, para 10, in order to comply with ANO 87"

UK Civil Aviation Authority describe themselves as "Specialist Regulators"

[3] From a CAA employee (10 Mar 2015) How bad does it have to get ?

 "Soul destroying, frustrating and lack of professionalism. They pick up on the latest organisational trends but have no idea how to implement these correctly and so it becomes a box ticking exercise. There is a whole level of middle to senior management who don't know how to manage people but have arrived in their position due to longevity at the company and are now seeing out their time to collect their pensions"
Advice to Management: "They'll be too busy covering their backsides and collecting the cash to listen"


BAAC-CAA-LAC corruption ? Ashcroft keeps Gwyn Topham .... in the loop
How bad does it have to get, before the Court's take over to protect the general public?


BAAC-CAA-LAC corruption ? Ashcroft keeps Gwyn Topham .... in the loop

Ashcroft litigation against UK CAA [Duty of Care / Human Rights violation, 23 Nov 2017]


  • Cost-cutting and an overstretched workforce at the Civil Aviation Authority have increased the risk of air accidents in Britain, according to a leaked internal report.
  • This was drafted by the CAA but never released.
  • It criticised failings, including in monitoring of flight training and licensing of pilots – and said the CAA did not have the resources to do their job properly.
  • The provisional report – produced by the CAA’s head of strategy and safety assurance at the request of senior directors (Mark Swan)– warned that the problems it identified were “those most likely to feature as contributory causal factors in aircraft accidents”.
  • A survey showed that fewer than 10% of employees believed their colleagues had time to undertake important safety activities to an acceptable standard.
  • Fewer than 20% of staff agreed that all of the organisation’s important safety functions were adequately covered.
  • It said: “Significant staff reductions … have led in some cases to insufficient access to expertise.” …. “in all areas reviewed, there is evidence that the resources available … are at minimum levels.
  • There is a general lack of resilience.”
  • The CAA had failed on all the safety inspections and checks there should have been before the Shoreham air show disaster.

How bad does it have to get, before the Court's take over to protect the general public?

The UK CAA have displayed an appalling lack of integrity regarding risks to the public

The LAC continue to take advantage of this farce by ransoming our community with their high energy aircraft [non-compliant with CAA safety documents]

1. Civil Aviation Authority (UK)

CAA regulatory review of GA: "for securing the safety of air navigation and the safety of aircraft and of persons and property carried therein, [and] for preventing aircraft endangering other persons and property". The UK Rules of the Air Regulations are enabled under the ANO"

2. Civil Aviation Authority (UK) 
QUOTE ....Accidents such as failure to get airborne, collision with obstacles after take-off and over-run on landing occur frequently to light aeroplanes. Many have happened at short licensed runways, as well as strips, often when operating out of wind or where there was a slope. Poor surfaces, such as long or wet grass, mud or snow, were often contributory factors. Many, if not all, of these performance accidents could have been avoided if the pilots had been fully aware of the performance limitations of their aeroplanes. The pilot in command has a legal obligation under EU Part-NCO and Article 87 of the Air Navigation Order 2009, which require the pilot to check that the aeroplane will have adequate performance for the proposed flight .. UNQUOTE

SSL 07: 8(c) "You should always ensure that after applying all the relevant factors .... the Landing Distance Required (LDR) from a height of 50 feet does not exceed landing Distance Available"

3. Civil Aviation Authority (UK) 
QUOTE .... Unlicensed aerodromes and private strips are often used by pilots and private owners. They may be more convenient or cheaper than licensed aerodromes; however, they do require special consideration. Approximately one third of GA Reportable Accidents in the UK occur during take-off or landing at unlicensed aerodromes .. UNQUOTE

Kate Staples: [General Counsel and Secretary to the CAA] 05 Sep 2016:
"In your letter you put me on notice to provide a comprehensive summary of the CAA's statutory responsibilities iaw the Civil Aviation Act 1982  ... I do not propose to prepare any such comprehensive summary unless ordered to do so by a court"

CAA: 'Aviation regulators recognise their principal duty of care to the genuine uninvolved third-party'

SERA. 3101 Negligent or Reckless Operation of Aircraft: An aircraft shall not be operated in a negligent or reckless manner so as to endanger life or property of others

Every year, fifteen thousand road users at Ashcroft rely on the integrity of the CAA ...

Andrew Haines: your 'regulatory framework' contradicts the CAA's legal statutory responsibilities
LAC are ransoming our public with 'any type of aircraft'. The buck stops with the CAA
Public Safety: Challenger enquiry: "Individuals who know of a situation that, unless acted upon with integrity might cause social harm, have a responsibility to contact any authority that will manage and control that situation in the best interest of the public".

The UK CAA: [lest we forget] have a legal responsibilty to protect the uninvolved public

The CAA was established by Parliament 1972 as an independent specialist aviation regulator

The CAA's main statutory functions are:

  • regulating civil aviation safety
  • management of UK airspace while maintaining a high standard of safety
Strategic Objectives: 
The CAA's mission is to provide best practice regulation and expert advice that are independent & enable civil aviation to best meet the needs of its users & society in a safe & sustainable manner

Legal 'earthquake': Mike Barnard [2013]  'the CAA is not there to save you from yourself. If you understand and accept the risks, you are entitled to take them. “Aviation regulators recognise their principal duty of care to the genuine uninvolved third-party' Web Site Design Company : eCommerce Software Shopping Cart Solutions