Ashcroft-NOLAC [a Diversion Airfield] 06 Oct 2015 Click on RED
The latest Runway surface grass conditions ... Here
The lowest airfield U/L Fuel prices in the UK ... Here [bona fide self service]
Ashcroft's response to LAC Ransom threats ... Here
Pilots who are (thankfully) not involved with the Lancashire Aero Club Click Here
The LAC have gone out of their way to 'butcher' our Airfield since 2010. I'm sure they won't mind if we spend the next 15 years giving them a few pointers on any subject
LAC sent us 1500 legal documents (now they'll have to endure our 1500 responses)
It's now been 9 months since Eric Mort shared his wisdom .. in his Newsletters
The LAC relinquished their rights to remain independent from Ashcroft on 23 / 11 / 2010
Eric's Aviation Schoool ? Who can trust this Ransoming bunch with no Bona Fides ?
The ultimate "no bona fides" Ransom Ride for the remaining LAC members ..
LAC Solicitor / Barrister conduct [ouch] Coxon says .. lose your throttle .. !
Legal irregularities passed on to Sir Andrew Burns & Kings Chambers [16 Oct 2015]
Our public injured / killed due LAC recklessness: a prison sentence will be pursued
An example of an LAC Committee Member [J Coxon] ranting at his members:
LAC LANDING COMP 12th SEPT.. "The number of members who entered was very disappointing. DO YOU EVER PRACTISE A FORCED LANDING?? If the answer is YES then why did you not enter and prove your skills and perhaps get your name on one of our Club Silver Cups. If your answer is NO then, in my opinion, you are taking a big risk for yourself and others.. DO A PFL ON YOUR HOME GROUND AT BARTON.. Depending on the traffic the FISOs will be pleased to accommodate you.." John C
Top Tip(s) John: Firstly get your dates right ... and ... Secondly listen to your members
... and the winner of the Lancs Loonies Landing Competition was ..?
The Lancashire Aero Club 2 Ton Focke Wulf [D-EARY] .. must observe German Law and must .. "operate the aircraft in such a manner that no third party is endangered, harmed, impeded or inconvenienced beyond the extent unavoidable under the circumstances"
Andrew Haines: the Cheshire Constabulary has reacted positively to safety concerns
LAC [D-EARY] AIRPROX with Ashcroft [G-INCE] 15 July 2015 [updated 29.09.2015]
The Lancashire Aero Club decided to carry out a secondary strike at Ashcroft 15.07.15
In a well organised stunt 3 LAC members invaded our Airfield and positioned Video Recording equipment just 10ft away from our into wind Runway 31.
Meanwhile a Ashcroft based Skyranger [G-INCE] was lined up for Take-Off on this Runway on a Test flight.
The LHS Handling Pilot and aircraft owner was Nigel Sleigh
The RHS [Pilot-in-Command] was David Bremner
Pilot in Command G-INCE [Bremner] falsely stated that N Sleigh was just a passenger
Nigel later commented that as G-INCE took-off, he noticed 3 persons standing very close to the [eastern] Runway edge.
He told Ashcroft that he thought they were 'kids' [who could argue with that, Nigel].
Shortly after take-off the aircraft owner [N Sleigh] observed the LAC Focke Wulf heading south and avoiding action [to the right] was required by Nigel Sleigh
Ashcroft insisted that the Pilot in Command [David Bremner] file an AIRPROX.
Mr Bremner agreed to this in an email to Ashcroft at 05:55 on 18 July 2015
Two months later the Civil Aviation Authority asked us for this AIRPROX report ... we asked Dave Bremner to provide this info but he stated that 'upon mature reflection' he decided not to file AIRPROX after all ... without informing Ashcroft.
Our response to Mr Bremner is [after mature reflection] stay away from Ashcroft
Mr Bremner [PIC] shirked his responsibilities leaving his Co-Pilot to file the AIRPROX
We are fortunate to be blessed with 29 Bona Fide pilots ... and Nigel Sleigh's testimony in the [belated] AIRPROX will be sent to Tony Rapson along with the LAC 'Low Flying' Butler Report.
E C Mort + [current] Committee you are all liable for LAC illegal ops ... ouch !
LAC Solicitor [W E Holt] still strangely silent ... attempting to pervert the course of justice
Will the last person remaining in the Lancashire Aero Club ... please turn the lights off ...
Nothing personal Eric Mort ... but it appears that you are being out-gunned
This webpage: ... a candid assessment of risks to the public due to LAC illegal flight ops
Lancashire Aero Club Rules (when will Eric Mort take action on public safety issues ?)
CAA NB: allowing LAC High Energy flights over our public highway will not be tolerated
Andrew Haines [Chief Executive of the Civil Aviation Authority 09 Sep 2015]
"Dear Mr Billington ... Further to Peter Gardiner's acknowledgement letter dated 3 August, I apologise that it is taking us slightly longer to reply to you, than you would wish. We are very much hoping to be able to send you a response by the end of the week"
Steve Billington [Ashcroft-NOLAC Airfield]
Under current circumstances, everyone understands the requirement to prioritise responses [and] to adopt a proportionate risk assessment. High energy manoeuvres at Ashcroft Airfield are not welcomed by our general public exercising their lawful right to use our eastern boundary road. Ninety Five percent of all aircraft using Ashcroft airfield have 15% "Energy" of the Lancashire Aero Club 2 Ton Focke Wulf [D-EARY] relying on illegal [military] Flight Manual Performance data in order to use our 500m grass runway terminating in a Public highway
Liability for Members of the Lancashire Aero Club due to illegal flying
Q. Do the LAC members care about breaches of Aviation Law affecting Public Safety ?
A. if they act unlawfuly [causing injury / death] the Lancashire Aero Club will be sued
Case Law shows that victims seek damages in 'pyramid' fashion [down to J Greenwood]
Lancs Loonies: Endangering the public / Ransoming Airfields / No Bona Fides
LAC Solicitor [William Ernerst Holt] 18.04.2012: "I appreciate that the owner of a German Registered aircraft is obliged to comply with the German Regulations .."
LAC 'Expert' [Robert John Commander] 21.04.2014: "The aircraft should be flown in accordance with the correct Flight Manual but the Pilot is required to comply with the Rules for the country in which the aircraft is being flow. However, if there is a difference in regulatory requirements, the aircraft must be flown in compliance with the more restrictive regulation between the country of registration (Germany) and the country where the flight takes place (UK)"
LAC Barrister [Andrew Latimer] 19.05.2014: "It is said that Mr Commander did not report as requested on the German air regulations, and indeed he does not, he does not really deal with that in terms of expanding on the German air regulations, and anyone who has read the court order from the District Judge knows that that was not part of his remit. The reason, of course, that he does not have to speak about the German air regulations is the territorial one: if you land in a plane, wherever it came from, wherever it is registered, it is UK law that applies in the United Kingdom, it will be policed by the CAA - you may, of course, have a regulator back at your home airport or where you are registered, you may have to satisfy them another day, but in terms of landing at this airfield in the United Kingdom, there is one law that applies, it is the CAA that polices it."
LAC Barrister: Complaint to Bar Council posted by Recorded Delivery [01 Sep 2015]
LAC Barrister: additional evidence supplied to Bar Standards Board [16 Sep 2015]
When will the Lancashire Aero Club [ever] act in a Bona Fide and up front manner ?
The Doctor is the next 'Duty Dog' [it appears that there is a double booking 30 Aug]
At least the BAAC Balloonist Expert [Robert John Commander] got something right:
[Apr 2014] "The aircraft should be flown in accordance with the correct flight manual but the pilot is required to comply with the Rules for the country in which the aircraft is being flown. However, if there is a difference in regulatory requirement, the aircraft must be flown in compliance with the more restrictive regulation between the country of registration (Germany) and the country where the flight takes place (UK)."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[19 May 2014] PreTrial Review [LAC -v- Ashcroft] High Court Judge Armitage sitting
The following transcipt is provided courtesy of John Larking [Verbatim Reporters]
MR LATIMER [LAC Barrister]: It is said that Mr Commander did not report as requested on the German air regulations, and indeed he does not, he does not really deal with that in terms of expanding on the German air regulations, and anyone who has read the court order from the District Judge knows that that was not part of his remit. The reason, of course, that he does not have to speak about the German air regulations is the territorial one: if you land in a plane, wherever it came from, wherever it is registered, it is UK law that applies in the United Kingdom, it will be policed by the CAA - you may, of course, have a regulator back at your home airport or where you are registered, you may have to satisfy them another day, but in terms of landing at this airfield in the United Kingdom, there is one law that applies, it is the CAA that polices it.
JUDGE ARMITAGE: I suppose, for a foreign registered aircraft, it may be the foreign country to determine what the status is of any other data that is held in relation to the particular aircraft? Or is that simply a manufacturer's ...
MR LATIMER: As I understand it, the manufacturers will produce some information themselves. The German registration means that - presumably, to maintain your registration in Germany you must keep the German authorities satisfied. I must admit that I do not know and I suspect that few people in the room do ...
JUDGE ARMITAGE: This is the difficulty that I am in in relation to this - I can see that it is a German registered aircraft, it is being operated in the UK for these purposes and it is interesting to try and understand, at least as a preliminary, why anyone thinks there is a German aspect to this, but it is because it is a German registered aircraft.
MR LATIMER: So the defendants say. The claimants' position is simply that it is irrelevant. It is a territorial matter. If you are in British airspace, you abide by British law and explain to the CAA if you fail to do so. So, in my submission, there is no - they would need in fact to amend the District Judge's order to get in a great deal more about the German air regulations
Lancashire Aero Club Barrister's false statements = complaint to Bar Council
Lancashire Aero Club Solicitor's response to the Attorney General is overdue
Lancashire Aero Club illegal operations ... update [25/08/2015]
Attorney General awaits LAC Solicitor's excuse for ... perverting the course of justice
Cheshire Chief Constable alerted to LAC illegal flight ops affecting public safety
HH Judge Armitage releases Court transcripts [Complaint to the BAR Council due Sep]
Lancashire Aero Club continue to breach ANO Rules of the Air affecting public safety
If LAC kill the Public due to illegal actiivities, they'll be sued for Criminal Homicide
J Coxon forget facebook face the facts ... don't let your Hotshots kill the General Public
You are the LAC Committee member, responsible for £370,000 of [fragile] LAC funds
Ex-CAA Hooligan & BAAC Balloonist have tried to trivialise safety concerns at Ashcroft
History is littered with attempts by part-timers trying to suppress genuine safety concerns
Recent events dictate that a more professional respect for Public Safety is long overdue
Allowing a LAC 2T Focke Wulf to use illegal Military Flt Manual performance data on a 500m grass Runway ending in a Public Highway is a [road] accident waiting to happen
Civil Aviation Authority Safety Sense Leaflet 14: Piston Engine Operations
The LAC are now restricted to Fly-out's. Don't stop at Llanbedr ... keep going !
Updates on: Lancashire Aero Club's attempts to operate their aircraft from Ashcroft
Attorney General / CAA / BAAC / MP's / Cheshire Police & Crime Commissioner: Here
Thanks to CAA Chief Executives Office [acknowledging safety concerns re LAC Ops]
Thanks to Lord Trefgarne for his acknowledgement / concerns re: LAC Ops at Ashcroft
Thanks to John Dwyer [Cheshire PCC] for passing on concerns to the Chief Constable
Court transcripts applied for [J Larking] re LAC Barrister comments with HHJ Armitage
Complaint to the BAR Council [re LAC Barrister] when transcripts received by Ashcroft
Kynaston - Grimsaw .... get your facts straight Eric... !
On 21 June, LAC President Tom Dugdale wrote to Ashcroft to say he was resigning with immediate effect. It was clear that he was dissatisfied with the way his club was being managed by the "malignant regime" [to quote Kate Howe]
The following steps are required for the LAC to use KHF Airfield more than 4 days a year
Step 1: Pick a 'popular' Duty Officer [not Eric] .. if that doesn't work ...
Step 2: Advertise a BBQ .................................... if that doesn't work ...
Step 3: Advertise a FREE BBQ .......................... if that doesn't work ...
Step 4: Pay the LAC members to attend [assuming the LAC can get their dates right]
Step 5: Try to embrace "the bleedin' obvious" ... and elect ... a better Chairman.
LAC: You are put on notice that you are all liable for damages due to LAC illegal ops
Members of a unincorporated Club will be held liable if sufficient warning has been given
By supporting the Malignant Regime. Kate Howe's comments [not ours] you are all liable
Our public will give LAC a 'jolt' [with lightning conduit ferocity] if you all continue not to act
We have all been patient .. but five years of LAC complaceny ... puts you all in jeopardy.
The Attorney General / CAA / Cheshire Police & Crime Comissioner are now informed
High Court action is now scheduled for 01 October 2015 [details to be published]
LAC: complacency on public safety issues? You are all at financial risk by the actions of the few
Members of the governing bodies of clubs and other unincorporated associations should take note of a recent court decision confirming that a committee member of a rugby club could be liable to pay a club liability of £147,000 personally, or be made bankrupt. Its governing body was called the management committee.
One of the committee members was also the club’s president [LAC Tom Dugdale, wisely .. has resigned]
Members of the governing body of an unincorporated association are personally liable for any payment.
All members were liable. Even worse, legally the committee members were “jointly and severally” liable
That meant: could start bankruptcy or any other legal action against any one of them for the full amount
It would then be up to that committee member to recover their share from the others [the LAC Members]
Club members should: take legal advice before accepting office as a member of the committee or other governing body of an unincorporated association, to reduce the risk of being taken to court for payment of the association’s debts ensure that fellow committee members are aware of their potential personal liability before an unincorporated association enters into a significant contract or carries out any activity that could create a legal liability ― for example, for personal injury ― if things go wrong
Steve Baldwin: it was up to you to save the LAC ... what happened!
LAC safety net: "Grim 4 Sure" [08 Aug].. not got a good track record but shows promise
Yet another BBQ at KHF [26 July 2015 .... Duty Dog: Eric Mort]
Mike Howells pulls the plug on the Rixton Fly-in [everyone is relying on Stuart Ord]
Chances of Eric's bunch acting in a Bona-fide / upfront manner? find out here
LAC President resigned 'bombs gone' Tom good for you [head & shoulders above us all]
A long overdue welcome .. to Tony Rapson and Rob Bishton, GA CAA
Above: A 32 ft high road crossing [steep angle of attack close to stall] .... 15/07/2015
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Microlight Pilots like Chris Finnigan [ex CAA] and BAAC Balloonist 'Expert' [RJC] do not have the experience to assess the risks of flying aircraft in a category above 450kg.
If you 'screw up' in a Microlight you are unlikely to do any harm to the general public.
Heavier / faster / aircraft with higher wing loading require careful handling and even the most talented of LAC Pilots [no disrespect Jack] can get caught out.
A Thorp T-18 crashed [in a similar location to DK's Focke Wulf above] because the pilot allowed the aircraft's airspeed to reduce below safe margins .. 'On final approach to grass Runway 27 the aircraft stalled and touched down in a farm field approximately 50 metres short of the runway threshold. The pilot’s assessment of the cause was that, pre-occupied by the need to land immediately, he had allowed the airspeed to decay during the final approach and the aircraft stalled before he was able to initiate an effective recovery"
Both Chris Finnigan and RJC have failed to properly assess the LAC risks at Ashcroft.
31 July: a plain speaking and 'candid' public safety document to protect our public
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Below: A 19'4" high road crossing with a more normal angle of attack ..... 30/07/2013
ANO Rule 5(3)a was deliberately constructed by the Civil Aviation Authority [genuine thanks to Lawrence Hay CAA FSO] to 'protect' the general public at Unlicensed Airfields.
Clearly this is a 'inconvenience' for the Lancashire Aero Club ... but it is the only protection that our public have against LAC 'Hotshots'.
The BAAC Balloonist 'Expert' has gone to extraordinary lengths to avoid this safety net
Considering he has recently stated that he was involved in the construction of this Rule ... it beggars belief that he now ignores it ... and states that Ashcroft's concerns regarding the operation of a [LAC] 2 Ton Focke Wulf [D-EARY] are ... Quote 'trivia' Unquote
Perhaps RJC [and his 'Hooligan' buddy Chris Finnigan] need a 'reality check' ... there is no 'rewind button' on a LAC Focke Wulf putting 4 of our road users in intensive care, as a result of [unlawfully] operating a 2 Ton German registered aircraft from our 500m Runway using unapproved Take off and Landing performance Data ... contrary to ... just about every CAA Publication on this subject ... Ironically confirmed by Chris Finnigan [ex] General Aviation Ops Inspectorate CAA
Ashcroft has ZERO tolerance on any 'Hotshots' endangering our general public ...
Eric Mort: Please confirm that you're still in charge and regulating your 'loose cannons'
Andrew Kenneth Halvorson [polite warning] ... you are treading on 'thin ice'
The Best Quote of the week:
BAAC Balloonist 'Expert': "It is unlikely that there are many aviation consultants with more experience in this particular field, considering my CAA policy background"
Lets get real ... this is the .. Navigator / Balloonist / Drone BAAC 'Expert' ... with virtually no 'hands-on' piloting experience .. [apart from Balloons] .. who has produced [quite probably] the most biased / bloated / botched (and subsequently fudged) 'professional' aviation safety report in the history of the BAAC.
Will BAAC President Lord Trefgarne agree with RJC [after he reads our Witness Statement]
John Wheeler ... suggest you get some [proper] legal advice. If any of our public are harmed as a result of RJC's report ... the BAAC will be answerable to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Second Best Quote of the week:
From Nigel Sleigh: "Steve, I couldn't figure out why those kids would be clowning around so close to an active Runway" ...
Nigel, it's just the Lancashire Aero Club ... being irresponsible ... again !
17:50[L] 15/07/2015 .... 3 x LAC position themselves only 10ft from active Runway
17:53[L] 15/07/2015 .... Skranger takes off on RW31 and notices LAC near Runway
17:54[L] 15/07/2015 .... LAC Focke Wulf blasts through Ashcroft Circuit southbound
17:54[L] 15/07/2015 .... Departing Ashcroft Syranger requires avoiding action [to right]
17:56[L] 15/07/2015 .... LAC Focke Wulf flies 32ft over our road close to 'flight stall'
When will the LAC realise that stunt flying is no substitute for Flt Manual performance data
Eric Mort: please explain to us why your members are endangering our public [again]
Lancashire Aero Club harms our public = public enquiry
Richard Miller [Senior Solicitor]: "LAC is underhand and not calculated to give you confidence in the bona fides of these gentlemen in any future dealings with them. I think you were entitled to expect that all negotiations would be conducted with transparency and “cards on the table” and it appears that this expectation has been far from met"
At a Farmer's Field 'Oop North' .. the LAC safety officer needs sacking
Pilots thinking of joining a "Nowt appening" Club should perhaps click Here
[no less than 3 seperate LAC legal / safety / criminal issues on target .. "quelle surprise"]
A BAAC Balloonist "Expert" has used 2 types of illegal Flight Manual Take-off and Landing performance data to 'fudge' a professional report concerning a 2 Ton MTOW LAC Focke Wulf using a 500m [TODA + LDA] grass Runway with an occasionally busy road on the eastern boundary. Ashcroft believes it appropriate for this "Expert" to resign and the BAAC Chairman should also 'consider his position' for showing apparent indifference to a report that endangers our road users.
Chris Finnigan 40 years experience has taught me to prevent 'mishaps' from occurring
At least the Balloonist BAAC "Expert" got something right: "The aircraft should be flown in accordance with the correct flight manual but the pilot is required to comply with the Rules for the country in which the aircraft is being flown. However, if there is a difference in regulatory requirement, the aircraft must be flown in compliance with the more restrictive regulation between the country of registration (Germany) and the country where the flight takes place (UK)."
John Wheeler, why did your Balloonist "Expert" not use the performance data from the correct (Civil) Flight Manual and why did he use performance data from a (Military) Flight manual that the Luftfahrt-Bundesamt have specificaly stated is "not part of the Civil approval of the FW-149"
The British Association of Aviation Consultants are recruiting 'Independent' Experts
Step 1. Ensure you have a clean driving license [and some form of aviation membership]
Step 2. Take any BAAC assignment ... even though you are not properly qualified.
Step 3. Absorb Forum gossip to get a flavour of events and 'throw your weight around'
Step 4. Strut around for 38 min airside [write it up as 90 min] and take some 'piccies'
Step 5. Decide which side that you are going to back and construct a padded report.
Step 6. Calculations must be based on wrong runway distances and unapproved data
Step 7. Dismiss all public safety concerns as 'trivia' and ignore sensitive questions
Step 8. Pick up a 'fat fee' and put it towards your Jersey retirement home .....
Step 9. Rest assured that any 'in-house' panel will bury any complaints against you
You are now BAAC: Victims of your biased & incompetent report will sue you.. Ouch!
BAAC comment: "It is irrelevant that it could also be operated unlawfully" ... Ouch!
John Wheeler please explain to our public how the BAAC can sanction 'unlawful ops'
A candid [corruption free] Witness Statement will sent to Andrew Haines July 31 2015
The BAAC "Balloonist Expert" likes throwing his weight around ..'Navigate' around this:
A candid [corruption free] report to the Attorney General [perverting the course of justice] . on track
Letter to Mort / Dugdale re: breach of Article 81 of the Civil Aviation Act  ... Here
We understand that an Airport has accommodation "not fit for purpose" ... surely not !
Lancashire Aero Club 'founded' 1922 ... Eric's Aero Club 'floundering' in 2015
Pilots who wish to join Eric's Aero Cub must comply with this application form
LAC want to use any type of aircraft on our 500m grass Rwy ending in a road
Hopefully Andrew Haines (CAA) can bring the LAC 'up to speed' on public safety issues
before our Community are KILLED by LAC buffoonery and ex-CAA / BAAC bad apples
CAA Safety Sense Leaflet 07c "Accidents such as failure to get airborne, collision with obstacles after take-off and over-run on landing occur frequently to light aeroplanes. Many have happened at short licensed runways, as well as strips"
Ashcroft-NOLAC makes no apology for 'plain speaking' ... public safety comes first
Eric's Hotshots: "kills family of 4 using our Airfield boundary public road"
Barristers for victims seek damages from Dugdale downwards [in 'pyramid' fashion]
Coroner demands Witness Statements from ex-GA CAA employee + Balloonist buddy
Ashcroft Public quote: "not a good time to be a Microlight Hooligan - Balloonist Expert"
Ashcroft-NOLAC makes no apology for 'plain speaking' ... public safety comes first
Erics Aero Club: likes ransoming and threatening airfields ... deal with this 'Raptor' first
Eric's 'Loose Cannons' multiple threats ... affect all of us at Ashcroft
Meanwhile 5 LAC public safety / legal enquiries are ongoing (or scheduled) where is Eric ?
Eric's Aero Club ... tried to take over Ashcroft on 23/11/2010 .. and then ransomed us
There are Public Safety issues at stake .. You're either "with us or against us"
Eric Mort is put on notice, regarding his responsibilities concerning the Civil Aviation Act
....... Relevant sections of the Civil Aviation Act  ... 76, 77, 78, 78a and 81
The CAA's "Primary duty of care" is to the uninvolved / uninformed public ... our PUBLIC
You will never need to pay for a windsock .. [until 2030] .. we will supply them for free !
Jane Billington has constructed this MK1 "NO LAC" Windsock ....... not a bad effort !
She is so grateful to that "Hidey Hole" LAC Solicitor who has "enthusiastically" generated nearly 1,500 legal Documents [but banged out when the going got tough] to 'persuade' us to accept a 2 Ton LAC Focke Wulf [using illegal AFM data].
Her special thanks to: Chris Finnigan [ex-CAA, microlight pilot] who advised his Balloonist "expert" friend, that our concerns regarding LAC road overflifghts were Quote "trivia" Unquote. Chris Finnigan is now flying his Microlight [and riding his motorcycle] like a hooligan [Banbury Police NB]
Meanwhile [thankfully] in the 'real CAA world' [Tony Rapson / Rob Bishton] ... we will be asking Andrew Haines [CEO] for his thoughts re: relying on unapproved AFM perf data whilst using a 500m grass runway with quite a busy road on the eastern boundary.
A 'penny' for the LAC Chairman's thoughts ... let's not go there due to "lack of material"
If anyone else has been shafted by the Lancashire Aero Club ... we'd be glad to help you
The LAC want this website to be just an 'information source for pilots' We'll revert back to that once they give assurances that they'll not endanger our public with heavy-fast aircraft over our road
Hopefully Andrew Haines can persuade Eric's bunch that Hooligan flying is not OK over our road
Does anyone know ... what is going on with .. Eric's Aero Club?
It seems that some LAC have problems with their aim. Perhaps we can assist
We're keen to reciprocate with Oop North humour. Anyone for the Golden shot
Eric says "it's a bit quiet at the moment" Eric, slide that earpiece switch to ON
It's the usual story ... quiet one month ... but busy the next !
Does anyone know ... what is going on with .. Eric's Aero Club ?
Does anyone know ... what is going on with .. Eric's Aero Club ?
For the record: Mort, Barham, Coxon, Latimer .."let their dogs loose" on us in 2010
It's time to .... "Wake up" .... Eric
Ian Weston (CAA ARE) Sep 2005 "These Airfield rights aren't worth the paper that they're written on". We ask Jim Ellis to be 'upfront' with his conversation with 'old school' CAA
Q. Is there anyone left in Eric's Aero Club with any .. Brio
Ashcroft-NOLAC "Twitterybook" is now online ... dont like it? .. blame the LAC
When will Tom Dugdale apologise [as LAC President on behalf of his members] for:
'Ransoming' Ashcroft and sanctioning LAC profit whilst sacrificing public safety
Threatening to flood Ashcroft with LAC members ... if we didn't sell our Airfield
Endangering our public by allowing LAC a/c to fly 19'4" over our boundary road
Allowing LAC Rep to send us 1,500 legal documents ..to enforce unsafe LAC ops
Allowing his 'loose cannons' to fraudulently impersonate the real LAC President.
Allowing his legal representatives to pervert the course of justice [flt safety issues]
E Mort: you like the prestige of being LAC Chairman but avoid the responsibilities that go with the job
LAC Committee didn't tell you that they ransomed Ashcroft [23.11.2010] .. how forgetful of them
The 'Latin speaking' representative of the Lancashire Aero Club has taken great pleasure in slicing up Ashcroft [since Dec 2010] like a hot knife through butter ... oh ... and just for good measure ... he has orchestrated the release 1,500 legal documents.
He's currently being investigated for perverting the course of justice ..withholding flt safety documents
We note [with some interest] that "Mr Latin" has been 'strangely silent' regarding the LAC Chairman's aircraft accident at Kenyon Hall Farm Airstrip .. affecting public safety.
A clear case of .. "double standards" ... "no bona fides" ... and ... "no surprise"
Ashcroft-NOLAC will be 'assisting' the LAC Chairman to complete his KHF AAIB report
Like being ransomed? Taken for a ride. Shafted by shysters, then join Eric's Aero Club
Why .. was the Lancashire Aero Club 'ejected' from a Church Vestry ... AMEN
Pilots who want to join LAC (for cheap landings) should perhaps .. reconsider
Pilots who want to "Bang out" from the LAC and join 'Bona fide' pilots click here
E Mort's patronising comments on Susan Czerski's article in the Elevator
"Susan Czerski has sent one in for publication. The one aspect that I feel about this article is very much like the newspaper industry where sensationalism is to be applauded rather than just giving the facts"
Mort, suggest you re-read her article sounds like she's got her facts straight, have you?
As the LAC 'Bona fide' index hits rock bottom... we join with Susan Czerski ... try our Quiz
Yes (you guessed it) these LAC belligerent claims are all ... BULLSHIT
City Airport: beware the bona fides of this belligerent bullshitting bunch
Eric Mort: It would be real peachy .. if you could stop your drunken members from phoning us
Eric Mort: we will not be 'ransomed' on public safety issues by your Club..
LAC NB: A premier London aviation lawyer [John Kimbell] has these comments
"Having learned for example that the owners of the Aircraft [LAC 2 Ton Focke Wulf] were not using the Civil Flight Manual which is the only appropriate manual and were not carrying it on the Aircraft, it was it seems to me quite proper for the Defendants [Ashcroft] to prohibit the Aircraft from taking or landing off until this was remedied"
Aviation Lawyer [John Kimbell, Quadrant Chambers, London]: "You seem to me to have a strong case for having permission to serve further expert evidence. The tone and content of conclusions 4 & 5 in the report are extraordinary and sufficient in itself to call his entire report into question"
Ashcroft 'salutes' Michael Fabricant for having the brio to stand up for his beliefs
Morts Code Christmas S.O.S message .. new Committee members ignored ..
LAC can't accept they no longer run Barton. Eric Mort refers to our old Clubhouse
Q. Why be a Member of the LAC? asks Eric Isaac .. (there's a lot of Eric's in this Club)
A. For a £60 landing fee package (you get the same by being based at Barton .. but for free)
Lest we forget ... on this day .. [10 Dec 2014] 3 years ago [10 Dec 2011]
The Lancashire Aero Club gave Ashcroft a Christmas Eve deadline of litigation.
The LAC Committee had resigned en masse (even the Chairman had stepped down)
The LAC ... have subsequently sent Ashcroft Airfield 1449 legal documents ...
Lancashire Aero Club ... Comments from a LAC ex-Committee Member [Kate Howe}
.. You may be aware that the existing Committee became split some time ago.
.. The majority of the Committee have been in conflict with the remaining members
.. That has never been healed and we now find ourselves in a calamitous situation.
.. The Chairman is ultimately responsible for the success or failure of the Club
.. We have nothing of substance to offer new members .. the membership is dwindling
.. The Club is now in a perilous position… we are inert ... we may not have a future.
.. It will require an extraordinary and formidable Chairperson ....who has drive & energy
.. They [he] will need tenacity, vision and brio and must possess the leadership skills
.. It will require herculean efforts to save this Club
.. I do not know if the person who possesses these unique skills …. actually exists.
.. I fear that under the current malignant regime a successful outcome is not possible
Thinking of joining this 'Malignant Regime' ? .. they would love to recruit you
Forget the LAA Rally .. visit the Lancashire Aero Club 'Pegging out Party' . Click Here
500 residents want to 'peg down' Hercules & Co ... Ashcroft has 1449 reasons to offer support
Common Sense and Best Practice approach to .... public safety
Plan to fly at 50ft above our Public Road to give adequate clearance to vehicles that are hidden from a high hedge when landing on RW27. Planning to fly over the road at 20ft is unacceptable and a breach of ANO Rule 5(3)a "Failure of a Power Unit"
After a High Court Judge recognises Ashcroft's concerns re: LAC low flying over public highways, commenting ...it "cries out" for a proper Expert assessment, Ashcroft responds by constructing a central HD tri-video device to protect our General Public (this is in addition to the 2 cameras that 'caught' the LAC flying over our road at 19ft 4 in)
These devices are affectionately referred to by Ashcroft (& the environs) as LAC Busters
... If the LAC continue to endanger our Public, we will contact our Member of Parliament
3. Public Safety ... Expert assessment (by a Hot Air Ballonist)
A "Top 50" London Aviation Lawyer criticised the LAC for trying to stop Expert assessment for a 2 ton aircraft that 'landed long' and crashed on a vehicle test track.
On 27.02.14 the LAC unilaterally appointed an Aviation 'Expert' (speciality: Balloons! )
On a 38min tour the 'Expert' assessed our boundary road and hedge as a 'non issue'.
Despite providing the 'Expert' with photos of the hedge in the summer (twice the height and much thicker than shown below) hiding vehicles / pedestrians (the general public) from view to pilots landing on RW 27 & 30, he apparently chose to ignore these risks.
The legal issues of 'Failure of a Power unit' [ANO Rule 5 (3)a] were not considered.
Safety concerns were dismissed as 'trivia' (contradicting a High Court Judge's assessment)
5. Fly over our road 50ft minimum to comply with Rule 5(3)a
Since our road is used by the general public, appropriate aircraft performance calculations (iaw the most recent performance data) are legally required to clear this road by at least 50ft iaw ANO Rule 5(3.a) ... pertinent to Unlicensed Airfields
SSL 07: 8(c) "You should always ensure that after applying all the relevant factors .... the Landing Distance Required (LDR) from a height of 50 feet does not exceed landing Distance Available"
In our experience, most pilots act in a responsible manner and adhere to the relevant CAA safety policy documents regarding aircraft performance and Rule 5
6. Civil Aviation Authority (UK)
CAA regulatory review of GA: "for securing the safety of air navigation and the safety of aircraft and of persons and property carried therein, [and] for preventing aircraft endangering other persons and property". The UK Rules of the Air Regulations are enabled under the ANO"
Ashcroft Airfield: attempting to secure the safety of aircraft & persons carried therein [and] preventing aircraft endangering other persons & property
7. Civil Aviation Authority (UK)
QUOTE ....Accidents such as failure to get airborne, collision with obstacles after take-off and over-run on landing occur frequently to light aeroplanes. Many have happened at short licensed runways, as well as strips, often when operating out of wind or where there was a slope. Poor surfaces, such as long or wet grass, mud or snow, were often contributory factors. Many, if not all, of these performance accidents could have been avoided if the pilots had been fully aware of the performance limitations of their aeroplanes. The pilot in command has a legal obligation under EU Part-NCO and Article 87 of the Air Navigation Order 2009, which require the pilot to check that the aeroplane will have adequate performance for the proposed flight .. UNQUOTE
9. See and Avoid ... Peripheral and ... Tunnel vision
Caution: Regarding limitations of the "See-and-Avoid" Principle. Peripheral vision is reduced under conditions of high workload.
"A number of researchers have shown that peripheral stimuli are more difficult to detect when attention is focussed on a central task"
Safety Sense Leaflet 13: Collision Avoidance
"Another inherent eye problem is the narrow field of vision. Although our eyes accept light rays from an arc of nearly 200°, they are limited to a relatively narrow area (approximately 10–15°) in which they can actually focus on and classify an object. Although movement on the periphery can be perceived, we cannot identify what is happening there, and we tend not to believe what we see out of the corner of our eyes. This, aided by the brain, often leads to 'tunnel vision'.
"The pilot’s functional visual field contracts under conditions of stress or increased workload.
The resulting ‘tunnel vision’ reduces the chance that an approaching aircraft will be seen in peripheral vision"